Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | WR*1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. SCSC 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 29 | 8 | 92% |
2. SCSC 5 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 24 | 11 | 67% |
3. SCSC 4 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 17 | 17 | 55% |
4. DSC 4 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 16 | 18 | 55% |
5. DSC 5 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 27% |
6. Yass 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 29 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
DSC 5 | DSC 4 | SCSC 3 | Yass 2 | SCSC 4 | SCSC 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSC 5 |
DSC 4 won!
2-8-174 — 1-5-159
|
SCSC 3 won!
3-9-135 — 0-0-46
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
DSC 4 |
DSC 4 won!
2-8-174 — 1-5-159
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
SCSC 5 won!
3-9-153 — 0-1-108
|
|
SCSC 3 |
SCSC 3 won!
3-9-135 — 0-0-46
|
TBD
|
SCSC 3 won!
2-7-139 — 1-3-99
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
|
Yass 2 |
TBD
|
TBD
|
SCSC 3 won!
2-7-139 — 1-3-99
|
SCSC 4 won!
0-2-109 — 3-9-160
|
TBD
|
|
SCSC 4 |
TBD
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
SCSC 4 won!
0-2-109 — 3-9-160
|
SCSC 4 won!
2-6-166 — 1-7-177
|
|
SCSC 5 |
TBD
|
SCSC 5 won!
3-9-153 — 0-1-108
|
TBD
|
TBD
|
SCSC 4 won!
2-6-166 — 1-7-177
|