| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Danieyal Dosani | 3 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 100% |
| 2. George Pearce | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100% |
| 3. Thimath Amarasena | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 67% |
| 4. Lincoln Dalton | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 50% |
| 5. Uma Elizabeth Chaturvedi | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33% |
| 6. Aliza Atif | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0% |
| 7. Saira Rana Atif | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 0% |
The competition table is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
competition tables. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Group A
| Lincoln Dalton | George Pearce | Aliza Atif | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln Dalton |
George Pearce won!
0 — 3
|
Lincoln Dalton won!
0 — 3
|
|
| George Pearce |
George Pearce won!
0 — 3
|
George Pearce won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Aliza Atif |
Lincoln Dalton won!
0 — 3
|
George Pearce won!
3 — 0
|
Group B
| Danieyal Dosani | Uma Elizabeth Chaturvedi | Thimath Amarasena | Saira Rana Atif | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danieyal Dosani |
Danieyal Dosani won!
3 — 0
|
Danieyal Dosani won!
1 — 3
|
Danieyal Dosani won!
0 — 3
|
|
| Uma Elizabeth Chaturvedi |
Danieyal Dosani won!
3 — 0
|
Thimath Amarasena won!
1 — 3
|
Uma Elizabeth Chaturvedi won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Thimath Amarasena |
Danieyal Dosani won!
1 — 3
|
Thimath Amarasena won!
1 — 3
|
Thimath Amarasena won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Saira Rana Atif |
Danieyal Dosani won!
0 — 3
|
Uma Elizabeth Chaturvedi won!
3 — 0
|
Thimath Amarasena won!
3 — 0
|
